U.S. v. Myres, 3:17-70071. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170314468
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND EXTENDING TIME UNDER RULE 5.1 LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . This matter is current set for a preliminary hearing/arraignment on March 22, 2017. The parties, with the consent of the defendant, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The defendant is currently out of custody. 2. The United States has provided and continues to provide the defendant with discovery materials, and the defense requires additional time to review the
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND EXTENDING TIME UNDER RULE 5.1 LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . This matter is current set for a preliminary hearing/arraignment on March 22, 2017. The parties, with the consent of the defendant, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The defendant is currently out of custody. 2. The United States has provided and continues to provide the defendant with discovery materials, and the defense requires additional time to review the ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND EXTENDING TIME UNDER RULE 5.1
LAUREL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is current set for a preliminary hearing/arraignment on March 22, 2017. The parties, with the consent of the defendant, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The defendant is currently out of custody.
2. The United States has provided and continues to provide the defendant with discovery materials, and the defense requires additional time to review the discovery, to confer with the defendant and the United States, and to prepare effectively.
3. There is good cause to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act as the ends of justice from such an exclusion outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Specifically, such an exclusion provides defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(iv).
4. Additionally, there is good cause to extend the time for a preliminary hearing under Rule 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. Specifically, such an extension provides defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account due diligence. Defense counsel also believes that such an extension is in the defendant's best interest. Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d).
5. Based on the foregoing, the parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court issue the proposed order continuing the preliminary hearing and excluding time under the Speedy Trial Act and extending time under Rule 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the consent of the defendant, and on good cause shown, the Court orders the following:
(a) The preliminary hearing in this case is hereby set before the duty Magistrate Judge on APRIL 12, 2017, at 9:30 a.m.
(b) The time period from the date of this Order, through and including the date set in Paragraph (a) above for the preliminary hearing, is excluded from the time period under the Speedy Trial Act and Rule 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Court bases this exclusion of time and makes the findings as stipulated by the parties above in Stipulations Three and Four.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
