MEDEIROS v. EQUIFAX, INC., 16-cv-06337-JSW. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170316a00
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE RREGARDING SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BANK OF THE WEST JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . On November 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this case and named Bank of the West, Inc. as a defendant. Although the other named defendants have appeared, Bank of the West, Inc. has not, and there is no proof of service on Baannk of the WWest, Inc. in the docket. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), "[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the com
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE RREGARDING SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BANK OF THE WEST JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . On November 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this case and named Bank of the West, Inc. as a defendant. Although the other named defendants have appeared, Bank of the West, Inc. has not, and there is no proof of service on Baannk of the WWest, Inc. in the docket. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), "[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the comp..
More
ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE RREGARDING SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BANK OF THE WEST
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
On November 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this case and named Bank of the West, Inc. as a defendant. Although the other named defendants have appeared, Bank of the West, Inc. has not, and there is no proof of service on Baannk of the WWest, Inc. in the docket. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), "[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court — on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff — must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time." The deadline to serve Bank of the West, Inc. expired on January 30, 2017. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss, without prejudice, Bank of the West, Inc. as a defendant inn this case. IIf Plaintiff seeks to extend the time to serve Bank of the West, Inc., he must show good cause for his failure to do so within the time limits set by Rule 4(m). Plaintiff's response to this Order to Show Cause shall be due by March 29, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
