Filed: Mar. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINTANDSETTING TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO AMENDED COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . THE PARTIES STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING: Plaintiff Abdelkader Elgawady and the Defendant City of San Francisco. by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order allowing filing of an Amended Complaint, establishing the method of service, and setting time to File Responses to Amended Compl
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINTANDSETTING TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO AMENDED COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . THE PARTIES STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING: Plaintiff Abdelkader Elgawady and the Defendant City of San Francisco. by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order allowing filing of an Amended Complaint, establishing the method of service, and setting time to File Responses to Amended Compla..
More
STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINTANDSETTING TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING:
Plaintiff Abdelkader Elgawady and the Defendant City of San Francisco. by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order allowing filing of an Amended Complaint, establishing the method of service, and setting time to File Responses to Amended Complaint.
1. Defendant City of San Francisco ("City") was served on or about March 8, 2017; and, prior to this stipulation, required responsive pleading to be filed on or about March 28, 2017. The parties met and conferred.
2. In good faith, Defendant City has brought to Plaintiff's attention deficiencies within Plaintiff's complaint filed in this matter and has agreed to allow Plaintiff to amend his complaint, via filing of an Amended Complaint, in order to cure any deficiencies of merit prior to the Defendant City filing a responsive pleading.
3. Defendant City will also forebear from filing a planned motion to dismiss and to stay action until after Plaintiff have filed the proposed First Amended Complaint.
4. Therefore, all parties agree and request that the Court order the following:
a. Plaintiff shall file and serve upon the Defendant City an Amended Complaint no later than March 31, 2017.
b. Defendant City shall file any responsive pleadings no later than April 21, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to allowing Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint and setting time for Defendant City tofile a responsive pleading. For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good cause showing, the Court adopts the stipulation on and GRANTS the relief requested herein.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall file and serve upon all Defendant an Amended Complaint no later than March 31, 2017, and Defendant City shall file any response to the amended complaint no later than April 21, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
