Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Otero v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 3:17-CV-00508-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170321854
Filed: Mar. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2017
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff EARLENE OTERO ("Plaintiff") and defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate as follows: RECITALS 1. Plaintiff field this action against Defendant on January 31, 2017 and served Defendant on February 2, 2017. 2. Defendant's initial deadline to respond to the Complaint was February 23, 2017 3. Pl
More

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff EARLENE OTERO ("Plaintiff") and defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate as follows:

RECITALS

1. Plaintiff field this action against Defendant on January 31, 2017 and served Defendant on February 2, 2017.

2. Defendant's initial deadline to respond to the Complaint was February 23, 2017

3. Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint up to and including March 27, 2017, so that Defendant could have additional time to investigate this matter and the parties may explore the possibility of settlement.

4. On or about March 15, 2017, Plaintiff informed Defendant that he intended to file a First Amended Complaint in the Action no later than April 7, 2017. Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendant agreed that Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint should be further extended to, April 28, 2017, which is 21 days from the anticipated date of Plaintiff filing an amended complaint.

This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION

1. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint or any amended complaint filed by April 7, 2017, shall be continued to April 28, 2017.

2. This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I — Alisa A. Givental — attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Elliot W. Gale. /s/Alisa A. Givental

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, Nationstar Mortgage LLC's deadline to respond to plaintiff Earlene Otero's Complaint or any amended complaint filed by April 7, 2017, is hereby continued to April 28, 2017. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer