Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Byard v. The City and County of San Francisco, 3:16-cv-00691. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170323a17 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2017
Summary: PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER RULE 7-11 TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FROM 25 TO 30 IN THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT Formerly San Francisco Case No. CGC 13-528788. Originally filed as Contra Costa Case No. C12-01656 WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Relief Requested Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to allow Plaintiffs' Opposition brief to Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion to be up to 30 pages long. Plaintiffs seek this relief due to the large number
More

PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER RULE 7-11 TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FROM 25 TO 30 IN THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

Formerly San Francisco Case No. CGC 13-528788.

Originally filed as Contra Costa Case No. C12-01656

Relief Requested

Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to allow Plaintiffs' Opposition brief to Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion to be up to 30 pages long. Plaintiffs seek this relief due to the large number and complexity of issues and facts they must present, and are trying to be as succinct as possible. Defendants' counsel said she would not likely oppose.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' administrative motion to extend Plaintiffs' Opposition brief page limit from 25 to 30 pages.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiffs' administrative motion to allow Plaintiffs' brief to be up to 30 pages in length in their Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer