SAJI v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, 17-cv-00025-YGR. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170329b35
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SUBMISSION; VACATING HEARING Re: Dkt. No. 17 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the parties' filings on defendants' motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 17.) The Court requires further information on the relationship between plaintiff's bankruptcy proceedings and this litigation, particularly whether the bankruptcy trustee is the true party-in-interest here, and whether such trustee must thus be substituted as the real plaintiff. The parties mu
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SUBMISSION; VACATING HEARING Re: Dkt. No. 17 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the parties' filings on defendants' motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 17.) The Court requires further information on the relationship between plaintiff's bankruptcy proceedings and this litigation, particularly whether the bankruptcy trustee is the true party-in-interest here, and whether such trustee must thus be substituted as the real plaintiff. The parties mus..
More
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SUBMISSION; VACATING HEARING
Re: Dkt. No. 17
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the parties' filings on defendants' motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 17.) The Court requires further information on the relationship between plaintiff's bankruptcy proceedings and this litigation, particularly whether the bankruptcy trustee is the true party-in-interest here, and whether such trustee must thus be substituted as the real plaintiff. The parties must file a joint statement no longer than ten (10) pages addressing their perspectives on this issue no later than April 4, 2017.
The Court further VACATES the hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss currently set for April 4, 2017. The Court may reset a hearing or require further briefing after the parties have filed their joint statement. Absent further notice, the Court will issue a written decision on the papers. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 78.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
