SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PATEL, 16-cv-00827-JCS. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170403a11
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 46 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the fore
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 46 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foreg..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 46
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
