WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C 17-00939 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170405d88
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE DISCOVERY HEARING TOMORROW WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Defendants shall please bring to the discovery hearing tomorrow: 1. A list of all servers (and their locations) used at any time in any way for defendants' LiDAR-related activities. Do not leave anything off the list merely because some other server supposedly houses the same materials. 2. A list of all of defendants' officers, directors, and employees, past and present, who have had LiDAR-related responsibilities or pro
Summary: ORDER RE DISCOVERY HEARING TOMORROW WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Defendants shall please bring to the discovery hearing tomorrow: 1. A list of all servers (and their locations) used at any time in any way for defendants' LiDAR-related activities. Do not leave anything off the list merely because some other server supposedly houses the same materials. 2. A list of all of defendants' officers, directors, and employees, past and present, who have had LiDAR-related responsibilities or proj..
More
ORDER RE DISCOVERY HEARING TOMORROW
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Defendants shall please bring to the discovery hearing tomorrow:
1. A list of all servers (and their locations) used at any time in any way for defendants' LiDAR-related activities. Do not leave anything off the list merely because some other server supposedly houses the same materials.
2. A list of all of defendants' officers, directors, and employees, past and present, who have had LiDAR-related responsibilities or projects, and their locations.
3. A list of all of defendants' suppliers and consultants, past and present, who have had LiDAR-related responsibilities or projects, and their locations.
4. The fully completed privilege log.
Defendants must also explain why they told the Court that Anthony Levandowski "has a good story to tell" (Dkt. No. 131 at 16:10) and were able to obtain signed versions of Mr. Levandowski's employment agreements with plaintiff Waymo LLC, but did not review his files and documents to retrieve the 14,000-plus allegedly downloaded from Waymo.
Plaintiff Waymo shall please bring to the discovery hearing tomorrow:
1. The "list of 15 search terms" it proposes (Dkt. No. 135 at 3).
2. A list of the top 50 most important files and documents from among the 14,000-plus allegedly downloaded by Mr. Levandowski, possibly to be used to prioritize and to expedite any subsequent searches.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
