Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, 3:10-md-2143 RS. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170406942 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER REGARDING THE PLDS DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO DELL'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. ("PLDS Defendants"), and Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. ("Dell") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, pur
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE PLDS DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO DELL'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. ("PLDS Defendants"), and Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. ("Dell") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's Order entered on February 15, 2017 (Dkt. No. 2228), defendants shall file their Supplemental Answers to Dell's First Amended Complaint within 45 days of the filing of Dell's First Amended Complaint, which the Parties calculate to be April 6, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Parties request additional time for the PLDS Defendants to respond to Dell's First Amended Complaint;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned counsel for the PLDS Defendants and Dell as follows:

1. The PLDS Defendants shall respond to Dell's First Amended Complaint by April 21, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)

I, Evan J. Werbel, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer