GREER v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, 3:15-cv-02307-WHO. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170406958
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 95. WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having been advised that the parties have agreed to settle, subject to contingency of approval by BART's governing authority, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the scheduled trial is VACATED. If approval is not obtained within 90 days, plaintiff shall promptly notify the Court and this order shall be vacated and this cause will be restored to the calendar for fu
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 95. WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having been advised that the parties have agreed to settle, subject to contingency of approval by BART's governing authority, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the scheduled trial is VACATED. If approval is not obtained within 90 days, plaintiff shall promptly notify the Court and this order shall be vacated and this cause will be restored to the calendar for fur..
More
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 95.
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Having been advised that the parties have agreed to settle, subject to contingency of approval by BART's governing authority, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the scheduled trial is VACATED. If approval is not obtained within 90 days, plaintiff shall promptly notify the Court and this order shall be vacated and this cause will be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
