LEVIN v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 3:14-cv-03352-CRB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170411836
Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The Court of Appeals remanded this case for the Court to determine, in the first instance, whether it should vacate its judgment in light of the City's adoption of a new ordinance. See COA Order (dkt. 127) at 2-3; Judgment (dkt. 93). The Court ORDERS the parties to brief the issue. The City shall have 14 days to file an opening brief that is no longer than 15 pages. Levin shall have 14 days after the opening brief is due
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The Court of Appeals remanded this case for the Court to determine, in the first instance, whether it should vacate its judgment in light of the City's adoption of a new ordinance. See COA Order (dkt. 127) at 2-3; Judgment (dkt. 93). The Court ORDERS the parties to brief the issue. The City shall have 14 days to file an opening brief that is no longer than 15 pages. Levin shall have 14 days after the opening brief is due ..
More
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
The Court of Appeals remanded this case for the Court to determine, in the first instance, whether it should vacate its judgment in light of the City's adoption of a new ordinance. See COA Order (dkt. 127) at 2-3; Judgment (dkt. 93). The Court ORDERS the parties to brief the issue. The City shall have 14 days to file an opening brief that is no longer than 15 pages. Levin shall have 14 days after the opening brief is due to file a response that is no longer than 15 pages. The City shall have 7 days after the response is due to file a reply that is no longer than 8 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
