Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pittman v. McConnell, 13-cv-02095-EJD (NJV). (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170413c42 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2017
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on March 24, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Alfred Pittman, Pro Se. ( ) Warden or warden's representative ( ) Office of the California Attorney General (X) Other: Newton
More

REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING

A settlement conference was held on March 24, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below:

(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Alfred Pittman, Pro Se. ( ) Warden or warden's representative ( ) Office of the California Attorney General (X) Other: Newton Oldfather and Mark Nicco. (2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear: _____________________________________________________________________ (3) The outcome of the proceeding was: (X) The case has been completely settled. ( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet attached remain for this Court to resolve. ( ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer