JUMPSPORT, INC. v. Health2Fitness LTD., 3:16-cv-06629-LB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170421e41
Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE LAUREL BEELER , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff JumpSport, Inc.'s Notice of Dismissal (filed on April 20, 2017). JumpSport informs the Court that it seeks to dismiss the claims alleged against Defendants Health2Fitness LTD d/b/a Rebound-UK, Maximus Life LTD, James Winfield and Heather Moore (collectively "Defendants") with prejudice to refiling. Defendants have neither responded nor appeared. Having considered Plaintiff's notice, the case fi
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE LAUREL BEELER , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff JumpSport, Inc.'s Notice of Dismissal (filed on April 20, 2017). JumpSport informs the Court that it seeks to dismiss the claims alleged against Defendants Health2Fitness LTD d/b/a Rebound-UK, Maximus Life LTD, James Winfield and Heather Moore (collectively "Defendants") with prejudice to refiling. Defendants have neither responded nor appeared. Having considered Plaintiff's notice, the case fil..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
LAUREL BEELER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff JumpSport, Inc.'s Notice of Dismissal (filed on April 20, 2017). JumpSport informs the Court that it seeks to dismiss the claims alleged against Defendants Health2Fitness LTD d/b/a Rebound-UK, Maximus Life LTD, James Winfield and Heather Moore (collectively "Defendants") with prejudice to refiling. Defendants have neither responded nor appeared.
Having considered Plaintiff's notice, the case file, and the applicable law,
IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff JumpSport, Inc.'s claims alleged against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
