DYTCH v. PEET'S OPERATING COMPANY, INC., 17-cv-00410-EDL. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170501j88
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to reinstate on or before June 15, 2017 for the purpose of proceeding with the litigation in the event a settlement has not been completed prior to that date. In the event a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel on o
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to reinstate on or before June 15, 2017 for the purpose of proceeding with the litigation in the event a settlement has not been completed prior to that date. In the event a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel on or..
More
ORDER
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to reinstate on or before June 15, 2017 for the purpose of proceeding with the litigation in the event a settlement has not been completed prior to that date. In the event a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel on or before the foregoing date, the dismissal will be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
