Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GoPro, Inc. v. C&A Marketing, Inc., 3:16-cv-03590-JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170503b17 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 01, 2017
Latest Update: May 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. NO. 39) JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff GoPro, Inc. ("GoPro") and Defendants C&A Marketing, Inc.; C&A Licensing, LLC; and PLR IP Holdings, LLC ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on April 14, 2017, GoPro moved for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 39); WHEREAS, the par
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. NO. 39)

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff GoPro, Inc. ("GoPro") and Defendants C&A Marketing, Inc.; C&A Licensing, LLC; and PLR IP Holdings, LLC ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2017, GoPro moved for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 39);

WHEREAS, the parties are discussing a resolution that would avoid further motion practice related to Dkt. No. 39;

WHEREAS, the parties have not yet completed these discussions but nevertheless wish to avoid unnecessary briefing, if possible;

WHEREAS, Defendants' opposition is currently due on April 28, 2017, GoPro's reply is due May 5, 2017, and the hearing is not set until June 15, 2017, thus providing sufficient time to adjust the briefing schedule while maintaining at least fourteen days between GoPro's reply brief and the hearing;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time by which Defendants may file an opposition to GoPro's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 39) is extended one week from April 28, 2017 to May 5, 2017;

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time by which GoPro shall reply to Defendants' responses to GoPro's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 39) is extended one week from May 5, 2017 to May 12, 2017.

The parties previously stipulated to extend time to respond to the Complaint, to continue the initial case management conference, to serve invalidity contentions and exchange preliminary claim constructions, and to serve damages contentions and responsive damages contentions. This extension will not otherwise affect the schedule for the case.

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

I, Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. NO. 39). In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Nathan B. Sabri has concurred in this filing.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer