Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: May 08, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW (DKT. NO. 40) JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff GoPro, Inc. ("GoPro") and Defendants C&A Marketing, Inc.; C&A Licensing, LLC; and PLR IP Holdings, LLC ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on April 24, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Inter Partes Re
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW (DKT. NO. 40) JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff GoPro, Inc. ("GoPro") and Defendants C&A Marketing, Inc.; C&A Licensing, LLC; and PLR IP Holdings, LLC ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on April 24, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Inter Partes Rev..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW (DKT. NO. 40)
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff GoPro, Inc. ("GoPro") and Defendants C&A Marketing, Inc.; C&A Licensing, LLC; and PLR IP Holdings, LLC ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review ("Motion to Stay") (Dkt. No. 40);
WHEREAS, GoPro requested a one week extension of time, and Defendants agreed to a one week extension;
WHEREAS, GoPro's opposition is currently due on May 8, 2017, Defendants' reply is due May 15, 2017, and the hearing is not set until June 15, 2017, thus providing sufficient time to adjust the briefing schedule while maintaining at least fourteen days between Defendants' reply brief and the hearing;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time by which GoPro may file an opposition to Defendants' Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 40) is extended one week from May 8, 2017 to May 15, 2017;
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time by which Defendants shall reply to GoPro's opposition to Defendants' Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 40) is extended one week from May 15, 2017 to May 22, 2017.
The parties previously stipulated to extend time to respond to the Complaint, to continue the initial case management conference, to serve invalidity contentions and exchange preliminary claim constructions, to serve damages contentions and responsive damages contentions, and to file an opposition brief to GoPro's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. This extension will not otherwise affect the schedule for the case.
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW (DKT. NO. 40). In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Nathan B. Sabri has concurred in this filing.
/s/Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith
Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
