Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Peasley v. Spearman, 15-cv-01769-LHK (NJV). (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170515d40 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 12, 2017
Latest Update: May 12, 2017
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on May 11, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, David Peasley Pro Se. () Warden or warden's representative (X) Office of the California Attorney General, Michael Quinn. () Othe
More

REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING

A settlement conference was held on May 11, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below:

(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, David Peasley Pro Se. () Warden or warden's representative (X) Office of the California Attorney General, Michael Quinn. () Other: (2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear: _____________________________________________________________________ (3) The outcome of the proceeding was: () The case has been completely settled. The parties agree that a proposed stipulated order for dismissal of this case will be filed with the Court on ________________. () The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet attached remain for this Court to resolve. (X) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time. Settlement negotiations will continue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer