Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Munning v. The Gap, Inc., 3:16-cv-03804-TEH. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170516846 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 15, 2017
Latest Update: May 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO APPEAR AT THE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 18, 2017 AT 2:00 p, TELEPHONICALLY THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . COME NOW, Plaintiff Laurie Munning and Defendants The Gap, Inc., Gap (Apparel) LLC., Gap International Sales, Inc., Banana Republic LLC., and Banana Republic (Apparel) LLC. (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants" or "Gap"), by and through respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff's counsel
More

STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO APPEAR AT THE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 18, 2017 AT 2:00 p, TELEPHONICALLY

COME NOW, Plaintiff Laurie Munning and Defendants The Gap, Inc., Gap (Apparel) LLC., Gap International Sales, Inc., Banana Republic LLC., and Banana Republic (Apparel) LLC. (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants" or "Gap"), by and through respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff's counsel may appear telephonically for argument on Plaintiff's Motion For Clarification scheduled before the Court for May 18, 2017 at 2:00 pm.

GOOD CAUSE exists for permitting Plaintiff's counsel to appear for the May 18, 2017 argument date telephonically.

WHEREBY, Plaintiff Laurie Munning and Defendant Gap by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate that Plaintiff's counsel shall appear telephonically on May 18, 2017 before the Court at 2:00 pm to argue Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification.

SO STIPULATED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer