IN RE ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 16-md-02741-VC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170517b08
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 15, 2017
Latest Update: May 15, 2017
Summary: PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 23: MOTIONS TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY Re: Dkt. Nos. 255, 256, 257, 261. VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The motion to compel production of tissue slides is granted. See Dkt. No. 256-2. The parties must submit a protocol for production within 7 days of this Order. The parties should also meet and confer on the best means of reconciling this additional production with the expert discovery schedule. If necessary, the Court will entertain requests to
Summary: PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 23: MOTIONS TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY Re: Dkt. Nos. 255, 256, 257, 261. VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The motion to compel production of tissue slides is granted. See Dkt. No. 256-2. The parties must submit a protocol for production within 7 days of this Order. The parties should also meet and confer on the best means of reconciling this additional production with the expert discovery schedule. If necessary, the Court will entertain requests to c..
More
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 23: MOTIONS TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY
Re: Dkt. Nos. 255, 256, 257, 261.
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The motion to compel production of tissue slides is granted. See Dkt. No. 256-2. The parties must submit a protocol for production within 7 days of this Order. The parties should also meet and confer on the best means of reconciling this additional production with the expert discovery schedule. If necessary, the Court will entertain requests to continue Daubert briefing, with testimony and argument to take place in the week of December 4 or December 11 (but no later).
The motion to compel further testimony from Jess Rowland is denied for the reasons stated at the status conference. Rowland's request that the plaintiffs be ordered to redact additional information from their motion to compel testimony is denied.
With the exception of exhibits 2 and 3 of the motion to compel production, the plaintiffs must refile their administrative motions to file under seal in light of the discussion at the status conference. Exhibits 2 and 3 of the motion to compel production are not sealable and will be refiled in unredacted form. See Dkt. Nos. 255-5, 255-7; Civil L.R. 79-5(f).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
