Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BURROWS v. EQUIFAX, INC., 16-cv-06356-PJH. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170518c22 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 17, 2017
Latest Update: May 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . On March 20, 2017, the court granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint in this matter, with leave to amend. Dkt. 66. The amended complaint was due by April 10, 2017. Id. at 21. Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs have stipulated to the dismissal of many of the defendants in this action. See Dkt. 54, 65, 69, 71. However, no stipulated dismissal has been filed with respect to two defendants, Equifa
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On March 20, 2017, the court granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint in this matter, with leave to amend. Dkt. 66. The amended complaint was due by April 10, 2017. Id. at 21. Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint.

Plaintiffs have stipulated to the dismissal of many of the defendants in this action. See Dkt. 54, 65, 69, 71. However, no stipulated dismissal has been filed with respect to two defendants, Equifax, Inc. and Asset Acceptance LLC.

Within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the court should not dismiss the action with prejudice, as to Equifax and Asset Acceptance, for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer