SMITH v. ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 16-cv-01676. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170519915
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 18, 2017
Latest Update: May 18, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION BY ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiffs Michele Smith and M.M., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem MICHELE SMITH and Defendant ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ("AUSD") hereby jointly move this Court for an order concerning the production of ESI in this case and have reached the following stipulations and request an order thereon. 1. Defendant AUSD shall make its
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION BY ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiffs Michele Smith and M.M., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem MICHELE SMITH and Defendant ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ("AUSD") hereby jointly move this Court for an order concerning the production of ESI in this case and have reached the following stipulations and request an order thereon. 1. Defendant AUSD shall make its ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION BY ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michele Smith and M.M., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem MICHELE SMITH and Defendant ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ("AUSD") hereby jointly move this Court for an order concerning the production of ESI in this case and have reached the following stipulations and request an order thereon.
1. Defendant AUSD shall make its best efforts to complete its search and production of responsive ESI to plaintiffs by June 30, 2017. Defendants shall search all available servers, as well as any archiving or journaling systems for documents which include any of the key word search terms on Exhibit A.
2. Defendant's search and production will include deleted emails to the extent they are recoverable.
3. Defendant will begin producing responsive ESI on or before May 19, 2017 and will make its best efforts to complete production of ESI to plaintiffs by June 30, 2017.
4. After production by AUSD, plaintiffs will give notice to AUSD of any document(s) they seek to have un-redacted and, if defendant agrees that the redacted name and/or information is relevant or is likely to lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible evidence, defendant will, within five days of plaintiff's notice, send out th notice to parents(s) attached hereto as Exhibit B, as required by FERPA as to any educational records.
5. If no objection is received from the parent in response to defendants notice within 14 days, Defendant AUSD will produce all such redacted documents identified by plaintiffs in native format without redaction.
6. If an objection is received, AUSD will provide plaintiffs with a redacted copy of the objection and plaintiffs may file a motion to compel production of the redacted records.
7. If AUSD does not agree that an unredacted copy of any document requested by plaintiffs' counsel should be provided, the parties will meet and confer in an effort to resolve the dispute. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute, it may be brought before the randomly assigned Magistrate Judge accordance with the discovery order.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
