Filed: May 18, 2017
Latest Update: May 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS & ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Civil Local Rules, Plaintiff Vana Fowler ("Plaintiff) through counsel, with the agreement of counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), respectfully submit the following Stipulation re: Briefing and Hearing Schedule. RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Complaint against Defendant on March 9, 2017 and ser
Summary: STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS & ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Civil Local Rules, Plaintiff Vana Fowler ("Plaintiff) through counsel, with the agreement of counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), respectfully submit the following Stipulation re: Briefing and Hearing Schedule. RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Complaint against Defendant on March 9, 2017 and serv..
More
STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS & ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Civil Local Rules, Plaintiff Vana Fowler ("Plaintiff) through counsel, with the agreement of counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), respectfully submit the following Stipulation re: Briefing and Hearing Schedule.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Complaint against Defendant on March 9, 2017 and served Defendant with the Complaint on or about March 15, 2017;
WHEREAS, Defendant removed this case from the Superior Court of California to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on April 14, 2017;
WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss on May 5, 2017; WHEREAS, Counsel for Plaintiff conferred with counsel for Defendant and in light of the complexity of the issues counsel for Defendant have agreed to the requested Briefing and Hearing Schedule;
WHEREAS, No party will be prejudiced by the requested Briefing and Hearing Schedule;
STIPULATION
THEREFORE, the Parties agree through their respective attorneys to the following:
1. Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss will be filed on or before June 9, 2017;
2. Defendant's Reply will be filed on or before June 23, 2017;
3. The Motion to Dismiss will be heard on August 24, 2017 at 2:00 pm;
4. In the interest of judicial economy and for the convenience of the parties, the parties jointly request that the Court vacate the case management conference scheduled for August 1, 2017 or consolidate the case management conference with the August 24, 2017 hearing on the motion to dismiss.
5. The only prior extension of time in this action was a 14-day extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint;
6. All other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur with the content in this Stipulation and have authorized the filing.
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED that the case management conference is continued to August 24, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., to be heard along with the motion to dismiss.
