WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C 17-00939 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170525986
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 24, 2017
Latest Update: May 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO REINSTATE PROVISIONAL RELIEF DEADLINE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has considered plaintiff Waymo LLC's motion to reinstate the May 31 deadline for defendants to comply with the second item of the May 11 provisional relief order (Dkt. No. 485) and defendants' partial opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 494). The motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants shall comply with the second item of provisional relief by t
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO REINSTATE PROVISIONAL RELIEF DEADLINE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has considered plaintiff Waymo LLC's motion to reinstate the May 31 deadline for defendants to comply with the second item of the May 11 provisional relief order (Dkt. No. 485) and defendants' partial opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 494). The motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants shall comply with the second item of provisional relief by th..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO REINSTATE PROVISIONAL RELIEF DEADLINE
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court has considered plaintiff Waymo LLC's motion to reinstate the May 31 deadline for defendants to comply with the second item of the May 11 provisional relief order (Dkt. No. 485) and defendants' partial opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 494). The motion is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Defendants shall comply with the second item of provisional relief by the original deadline of MAY 31 AT NOON except insofar as compliance would implicate either issues raised by non-party Anthony Levandowski's motion to modify the May 11 provisional relief order (Dkt. No. 466) or privilege disputes currently pending before Judge Corley, in which case the deadline remains JUNE 23 AT NOON. This order supersedes and partially vacates the prior order continuing the provisional relief deadline (Dkt. No. 471).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
