Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Naveed v. City of San Jose, 5:15-cv-05298 EDL. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170526b16 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 25, 2017
Latest Update: May 25, 2017
Summary: SECOND STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF Civil PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A). ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiffs Mohammad Badar Naveed and Humza Ahmad, and all remaining defendants, including defendants City of San Jose, Officer Wallace, Officer Tran, and Officer Ornelas ("City Defendants") that in response to the settlement obtained and after having met and conferred, Plaintiffs' Complaint and each cause of action, against
More

SECOND STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF Civil PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A).

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiffs Mohammad Badar Naveed and Humza Ahmad, and all remaining defendants, including defendants City of San Jose, Officer Wallace, Officer Tran, and Officer Ornelas ("City Defendants") that in response to the settlement obtained and after having met and conferred, Plaintiffs' Complaint and each cause of action, against each remaining defendant, should be dismissed with prejudice against all remaining defendants, including City Defendants named above.

The parties thereby agree as follows:

Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice against all defendants, including City Defendants. This Stipulation and Dismissal is brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the stipulation is GRANTED.

Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer