Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BYARD v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, C 16-00691 WHA. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170526b19 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 25, 2017
Latest Update: May 25, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment, FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of defendants The City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Police Department, Sergeant Gerald Darcy, Inspector Martin Ohalloran, Sergeant Ueugen Geleano, Sergeant John Bragagnolo, Sergeant Jesus Pena, Officer Michael Simmons, Sergeant Peter Thoshinsky, Officer John Van Koll, Officer Thomas Cunnane, and Officer
More

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment, FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of defendants The City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Police Department, Sergeant Gerald Darcy, Inspector Martin Ohalloran, Sergeant Ueugen Geleano, Sergeant John Bragagnolo, Sergeant Jesus Pena, Officer Michael Simmons, Sergeant Peter Thoshinsky, Officer John Van Koll, Officer Thomas Cunnane, and Officer Randy Ly, and against plaintiffs Alan Byard, Robert L. Buns, Calvin C. Wiley, John J. Andrews, Scott Hart, Todd Hart, Samuel J. Reyes, Sr., Theodore Torres, John Barry, Antonio White (as successor-in-interest of Serge J. White), Hanley Chan, Julia Curtis (as successor-in-interest of Earl L. Curtis), Anthony Cirimele, John Fitzinger, The San Francisco Patrol Special Polcie Officers Alliance, The San Francisco Patrol Special Police Oifficers Association, Inc., and San Francisco Patrol Police.

The Clerk shall please CLOSE THE FILE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer