Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

INTRI-PLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. NHK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, 3:17-cv-01097-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170530d24 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 26, 2017
Latest Update: May 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [CORRECTED] [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed its complaint on March 3, 2017 naming as Defendants NHK International Corporation ("NHK International"), NHK Spring Co., LTD. ("NHK Spring"), Ogaki Seiko Co., LTD. ("Ogaki Seiko") and Seiko High Tec Corp. ("Seiko High Tec") (collectively, the "Defendants") (D.I. 1); WHEREAS, on March 6, 2017, the Court issued an Or
More

STIPULATION AND [CORRECTED] [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed its complaint on March 3, 2017 naming as Defendants NHK International Corporation ("NHK International"), NHK Spring Co., LTD. ("NHK Spring"), Ogaki Seiko Co., LTD. ("Ogaki Seiko") and Seiko High Tec Corp. ("Seiko High Tec") (collectively, the "Defendants") (D.I. 1);

WHEREAS, on March 6, 2017, the Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (D.I. 7) setting May 10, 2017 as the deadline to hold a Rule 26(f) conference, May 24, 2017 as the deadline for the Initial Disclosures and the Joint Case Management Statement, and May 31, 2017 for the Initial Case Management Conference;

WHEREAS, on March 27, 2017, the Court issued an Order Regarding Service of Process (D.I. 20) moving the time to answer the complaint to June 7, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Defendants have not yet filed an answer to the complaint;

WHEREAS, on May 10, 2017, the parties held their Rule 26(f) conference;

WHEREAS, on May 11, 2017, the Court issued an Order Reassigning Case (D.I. 29) reassigning this case to the Honorable Judge Edward M. Chen and vacating the previously-scheduled Initial Case Management Conference;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties that:

1. Notwithstanding the times set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (D.I. 7), the deadline for the Initial Disclosures shall be June 7, 2017; and

2. No other dates or deadlines shall be modified by this stipulation and order.

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

Pursuant to the Northern District of California's Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for the Initial Disclosures shall be June 7, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer