Gaube v. Klein, 4:16-cv-06828-YGR. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170530d49
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 26, 2017
Latest Update: May 26, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered against GAUBE and in favor of each and every Defendant on each cause of action, that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and that this JUDGMENT is collateral estoppel and res judicata against Plaintiff, and bars any claims GAUBE may have against any Defendant which in any way relates to or arises
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered against GAUBE and in favor of each and every Defendant on each cause of action, that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and that this JUDGMENT is collateral estoppel and res judicata against Plaintiff, and bars any claims GAUBE may have against any Defendant which in any way relates to or arises o..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered against GAUBE and in favor of each and every Defendant on each cause of action, that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and that this JUDGMENT is collateral estoppel and res judicata against Plaintiff, and bars any claims GAUBE may have against any Defendant which in any way relates to or arises out of any Defendant's investment in Classico Foods, LLC. Each party is to bear its own fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
