Homampour v. California Physicians' Service, 3:15-cv-05003-WHO. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170531b75
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 26, 2017
Latest Update: May 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court orders that: 1. Homampour's individual claims shall be dismissed with prejudice; 2. The claims of the other named plaintiffs, John Bartels and Jon Naka, as well as the claims of the putative class, shall be dismissed without prejudice; and 3. The Settling Parties shall bear their own attorn
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court orders that: 1. Homampour's individual claims shall be dismissed with prejudice; 2. The claims of the other named plaintiffs, John Bartels and Jon Naka, as well as the claims of the putative class, shall be dismissed without prejudice; and 3. The Settling Parties shall bear their own attorne..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
ORDER
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court orders that:
1. Homampour's individual claims shall be dismissed with prejudice;
2. The claims of the other named plaintiffs, John Bartels and Jon Naka, as well as the claims of the putative class, shall be dismissed without prejudice; and
3. The Settling Parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with this action.
This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Settling Parties and this action for the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
