Peacock v. The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, LLC, 3:17-cv-01918-JST. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170531c02
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 30, 2017
Latest Update: May 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT OR FILE OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant, The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, LLC ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Brendan Peacock ("Plaintiff"), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint and
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT OR FILE OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant, The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, LLC ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Brendan Peacock ("Plaintiff"), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint and ..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT OR FILE OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant, The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, LLC ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Brendan Peacock ("Plaintiff"), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial on or before June 30, 2017.
The parties further stipulate and respectfully request that the Case Management Conference scheduled for Monday, July 12, 2017 be re-set to Monday, August 23, 2017 at 2 pm or as soon thereafter as the Court's schedule allows, with the Joint Case Management Conference Statement due seven Court days (August 7, 2017) prior to the conference. The parties are engaged in settlement discussions and seek time to pursue possible settlement of this case. The initial case management conference was scheduled for June 29, 2017, but was then re-scheduled by the Court to July 12, 2017 when the case was re-assigned to Judge Tigar. The requested continuance would have minimal impact on the schedule for the case which was filed just last month.
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
