Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-00517-WHO. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170605904 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to paragraph 1(d) of the Honorable William H. Orrick's Case Management Conference Order (Dkt. 20) and L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs Sherida Johnson, Harry Gunsenhouser, and Subrina Seenarain ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Nissan North America ("NNA") (collectively, the "Parties") en
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to paragraph 1(d) of the Honorable William H. Orrick's Case Management Conference Order (Dkt. 20) and L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs Sherida Johnson, Harry Gunsenhouser, and Subrina Seenarain ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Nissan North America ("NNA") (collectively, the "Parties") enter into this stipulation with reference to the following facts and recitals:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Sherida Johnson filed the original complaint in this action on February 1, 2017 (Dkt. 1);

WHEREAS, by Order dated February 21, 2017, the Court set a Case Management conference on May 9, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. 20);

WHEREAS, by Order dated April 14, 2017, the Court granted the parties' joint stipulation to 1) extend the time for Defendant NNA to file its Motion to Dismiss to May 2, 2017; 2) for Plaintiffs to file their brief in opposition to June 6, 2017; 3) for NNA to file its reply brief to June 23, 2017; and 4) continuing the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference to July 12, 2017 (Dkt.34);

WHEREAS NNA filed its Motion to Dismiss on May 2, 2017 (Dkt. 35);

WHEREAS, due to the complexity of Defendant's motion, which raises novel issues not heretofore raised in related litigation; and

WHEREAS, due to Plaintiffs' counsel's unanticipated briefing obligations relating to trials in other matters pending before other courts;

Plaintiffs and NNA stipulate and agree as follows and request the Court enter an Order as follows:

1. Plaintiffs' brief in opposition to NNA's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint shall be filed by June 27, 2017;

2. NNA's reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint shall be filed by July 24, 2017;

3. The hearing on NNA's motion to dismiss will be set for Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable William H. Orrick, or to any later date convenient to the Court;

4. The Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the July 12, 2017 case management conference to August 9, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., the date of the hearing on NNA's motion to dismiss, or to any later date convenient to the Court;

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court hereby orders as follows:

1. Plaintiffs' Opposition to NNA's Motion to Dismiss is due on June 27, 2017; 2. NNA's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss is due on July 24, 2017; 3. The Initial Case Management Conference is continued from July 12, 2017 to _________, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. NNA's Motion to Dismiss will also be heard on this date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer