Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JOHNSON v. TAORMINO, 16-cv-01491-HRL. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170614909 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . In April, after being informed that this action had settled, the court ordered the parties to appear on June 13, 2017, and show cause why the case should not be dismissed. Dkt. No. 42. Plaintiff and the Taormino Defendants appeared at the show cause hearing to inform the court that the case had not yet been dismissed because Defendant Joyplace QSR, Inc., had not signed the settlemen
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR

In April, after being informed that this action had settled, the court ordered the parties to appear on June 13, 2017, and show cause why the case should not be dismissed. Dkt. No. 42. Plaintiff and the Taormino Defendants appeared at the show cause hearing to inform the court that the case had not yet been dismissed because Defendant Joyplace QSR, Inc., had not signed the settlement agreement. Dkt. Nos. 45, 46, 47. Joyplace did not appear at the hearing. Dkt. No. 47.

As a result, the court orders John Torkel Hill, counsel for Joyplace, to appear and show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failure to follow a court order (i.e., by failing to appear at the show cause hearing). Hill shall also be prepared to discuss the status of the settlement. The show cause hearing is set for Tuesday, June 27, 2017, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor of the United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, CA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer