Strome v. Radnet Employee Benefit Plan, 3:16-cv-01242-WHO. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170615a27
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . By this Stipulation and [proposed] Order, the parties respectfully request that the Court dismiss the action in its entirety without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and direct that plaintiff may submit his application for recovery of attorneys' fees and expenses under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1132(g) within thirty days of the Court's order. A proposed form of order is set forth b
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . By this Stipulation and [proposed] Order, the parties respectfully request that the Court dismiss the action in its entirety without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and direct that plaintiff may submit his application for recovery of attorneys' fees and expenses under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1132(g) within thirty days of the Court's order. A proposed form of order is set forth be..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
By this Stipulation and [proposed] Order, the parties respectfully request that the Court dismiss the action in its entirety without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and direct that plaintiff may submit his application for recovery of attorneys' fees and expenses under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §1132(g) within thirty days of the Court's order. A proposed form of order is set forth below.
ORDER
The parties having stipulated as set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The action is hereby dismissed without prejudice;
2. Plaintiff may file and serve his application for recovery of attorneys' fees and expenses under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §1132(g) within thirty days of entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
I, Julian M. Baum, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the foregoing document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories.
Dated: June 13, 2017.
Respectfully submitted,
JULIAN M. BAUM & ASSOCIATES
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
By: /s/ by Julian M. Baum
Julian M. Baum
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Glenn M. Strome, M.D.
Source: Leagle
