HERRERA v. U.S., C 08-0730 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170626792
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Our court of appeals granted defendant Luis Herrera's motion to file a second successive Section 2255 petition in April 2017. Herrera thereafter filed his motion, pro se. On June 14, Herrera was assigned counsel, and his counsel moved to amend his Section 2255 motion pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(2), allowing a party to amend a pleading "when justice so requires." Herrera argues that justice requires amendment because the issues in
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Our court of appeals granted defendant Luis Herrera's motion to file a second successive Section 2255 petition in April 2017. Herrera thereafter filed his motion, pro se. On June 14, Herrera was assigned counsel, and his counsel moved to amend his Section 2255 motion pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(2), allowing a party to amend a pleading "when justice so requires." Herrera argues that justice requires amendment because the issues in ..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Our court of appeals granted defendant Luis Herrera's motion to file a second successive Section 2255 petition in April 2017. Herrera thereafter filed his motion, pro se.
On June 14, Herrera was assigned counsel, and his counsel moved to amend his Section 2255 motion pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(2), allowing a party to amend a pleading "when justice so requires." Herrera argues that justice requires amendment because the issues in this action are complex and would benefit from attorney briefing, and because Herrera filed his motion almost a year ago and there have since been developments in the law, which bear directly on his motion.
The Court ordered the government to show cause why Herrera's motion to amend should not be granted. On June 22, the government replied, stating that it has no objection to amendment as long as Herrera does not raise any new claims which were not approved by our court of appeals in granting his second successive Section 2255 petition.
In the interest of justice, Herrera's motion to amend his Section 2255 motion is GRANTED. Herrera may not raise any new claims not the basis for our court of appeals' grant of his motion to file a successive petition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
