Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

hiQ Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation, 17-CV-03301-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170628b79 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LINKEDIN CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER WHEREAS, Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc. ("hiQ") filed the complaint in this action against Defendant LinkedIn Corporation ("LinkedIn") on June 7, 2017 and served LinkedIn on June 8, 2017; WHEREAS, hiQ consented to provide LinkedIn an extension to answer or otherwise respond to the compla
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LINKEDIN CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc. ("hiQ") filed the complaint in this action against Defendant LinkedIn Corporation ("LinkedIn") on June 7, 2017 and served LinkedIn on June 8, 2017;

WHEREAS, hiQ consented to provide LinkedIn an extension to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint;

WHEREAS, there have been no prior extensions of the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action;

THEREFORE, LinkedIn and hiQ hereby stipulate that LinkedIn's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and including July 31, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1 Attestation

I, Jonathan H. Blavin, am the ECF user whose credentials were utilized in the electronic filing of this document. In accordance with N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Deepak Gupta concurred in the filing of this document.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer