Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PUREPREDICTIVE, INC. v. H2O.AI, INC., 3:17-cv-03049-WHO. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170706a37 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2017
Summary: CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME & ORDER THEREON WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiff PurePredictive, Inc. ("PPI") and Defendant H2O.ai, Inc. ("H2O") hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, as follows. On June 21, 2017, PPI and H2O jointly requested that the date for the hearing on H2O's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Original Complaint (the "Motion") then set for July 19, 2017 at 2:00 p.m, be enlarged to August 2, 2017. The C
More

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME & ORDER THEREON

Plaintiff PurePredictive, Inc. ("PPI") and Defendant H2O.ai, Inc. ("H2O") hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, as follows.

On June 21, 2017, PPI and H2O jointly requested that the date for the hearing on H2O's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Original Complaint (the "Motion") then set for July 19, 2017 at 2:00 p.m, be enlarged to August 2, 2017. The Court issued an order on June 22, 2017 noting that it was not available on August 2, 2017, and setting the hearing on the Motion for August 9, 2017. Because PPI's counsel is scheduled to be in a deposition on August 9, 2017, the parties hereby stipulate to enlarge the hearing date to August 16, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. The parties further stipulate that PPI's response to the Motion is due by July 12, 2017, and H2O's reply is due by July 26, 2017.

This would be the second extension in this case regarding this motion.

This amendment to this Court's order will not affect any other deadlines or hearing dates in this action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, R. Jeremy Adamson, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

/s/R. Jeremy Adamson

IT IS ORDERED that the forgoing Agreement is approved.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer