Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Uber FCRA Litigation, 14-cv-05200-EMC (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170710887
Filed: Jul. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES' TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (DKT. 242) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, on June 29, 2017, the Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 242). WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to submit to devise and submit a design for a "trial test run . . . to ascertain what percentage [of emails] are
More

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES' TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (DKT. 242)

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2017, the Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 242).

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to submit to devise and submit a design for a "trial test run . . . to ascertain what percentage [of emails] are likely to be blocked as spam . . . within seven (7) days from the date of . . . [the] order for approval." (Dkt. 242, 15: 20-23.)

WHEREAS, since June 29, 2017, the Parties have worked diligently to submit the design for the trial test run by July 6, 2017, however, given the holiday weekend and logistics involved in devising a design for such a test run (i.e. consultation with appropriate experts, meet and confer between the Parties themselves), the Parties will require an additional fourteen (14) days (to July 20, 2017) to make a submission to the Court on this issue.

THEREFORE, the Parties to this Stipulation hereby stipulate and respectfully request as follows: that the Court extend the deadline for the Parties to make its submission regarding the email test (along with an updated Preliminary Approval Order) on or before July 20, 2017.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer