Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Center for Biological Diversity v. Pruitt, 3:16-cv-5492-TEH. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170714914 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EPA'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Environmental Health and Defendant Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), hereby stipulate to and request that Court enter an order to extend the deadli
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EPA'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Environmental Health and Defendant Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), hereby stipulate to and request that Court enter an order to extend the deadline for EPA to file its Reply In Support of EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment from August 17, 2017 to August 24, 2017. On February 27, 2017, pursuant to the parties' request for the briefing schedule as set forth in their Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt. No. 32), the Court set the following schedule:

Deadline Due Date EPA's Combined Opposition to Plaintiffs' July 13, 2017 Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment Plaintiffs' Combined Reply in Support of August 3, 2017 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment EPA's Reply in Support of EPA's Cross-Motion August 17, 2017 for Summary Judgment Hearing September 11, 2017

The date set for EPA's reply brief, August 17, 2017, conflicts with EPA counsel's recently scheduled vacation. Therefore, the parties respectfully request to reset the deadline to August 24, 2017. This extension will not alter the date of the hearing on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment set for September 11, 2017 or any other event or deadline already fixed by Court order. See Declaration of Leslie M. Hill (attached as Exhibit A).

Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter an order resetting the deadline for EPA to file its Reply In Support of EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment to August 24, 2017.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation and for good cause shown, the Order Setting Schedule (Dkt. No. 22) is hereby revised as follows:

Deadline Due Date EPA's Combined Opposition to Plaintiffs' July 13, 2017 Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment Plaintiffs' Combined Reply in Support of August 3, 2017 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment EPA's Reply in Support of EPA's Cross-Motion August 24, 2017 for Summary Judgment Hearing September 11, 2017

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer