DYTCH v. MAGANA, 17-cv-00438-SI. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170802936
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE Re: Dkt. No. 25 SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Albert Dytch filed a motion to strike defendant Maxaco, LLC's ("Maxaco's") answer, Dkt. No. 13, because Maxaco improperly appeared pro se and needs to be represented by counsel. See Mot. to Strike (Dkt. No. 25) at 2 (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194 , 196 (1993)). Maxaco has not filed a response to plaintiff's motion, nor has it retained counsel to represent it in this action.
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE Re: Dkt. No. 25 SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Albert Dytch filed a motion to strike defendant Maxaco, LLC's ("Maxaco's") answer, Dkt. No. 13, because Maxaco improperly appeared pro se and needs to be represented by counsel. See Mot. to Strike (Dkt. No. 25) at 2 (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194 , 196 (1993)). Maxaco has not filed a response to plaintiff's motion, nor has it retained counsel to represent it in this action. ..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE
Re: Dkt. No. 25
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Albert Dytch filed a motion to strike defendant Maxaco, LLC's ("Maxaco's") answer, Dkt. No. 13, because Maxaco improperly appeared pro se and needs to be represented by counsel. See Mot. to Strike (Dkt. No. 25) at 2 (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 196 (1993)). Maxaco has not filed a response to plaintiff's motion, nor has it retained counsel to represent it in this action.
Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to strike is GRANTED. Maxaco is hereby ORDERED to appear through counsel within two weeks of the date of this order. If no appearance through counsel is filed, defendant Maxaco may be found in default.
This order resolves Dkt. No. 25.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
