MARCUS v. CITY OF RICHMOND, 16-cv-02871-MMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170809849
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2017
Summary: SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On August 1, 2017, plaintiff electronically filed his "Motion for Relief." Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed. . . marked `Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(
Summary: SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On August 1, 2017, plaintiff electronically filed his "Motion for Relief." Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed. . . marked `Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7..
More
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
On August 1, 2017, plaintiff electronically filed his "Motion for Relief." Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed. . . marked `Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced document.
The Court has previously advised plaintiff of his failure to comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders in connection with earlier-filed documents. (See Order, filed August 15, 2016.) Such reminder appears to have had little to no effect on compelling compliance therewith.
Parties are expected to comply with court rules without repeated reminders. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby advised that the Court will impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any further electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
