CALIFORNIA v. VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION, C 17-03786 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170816b75
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE HAYES' DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Defendants request that the Court take notice of the deposition testimony of California's expert, Dr. John Hayes. They submit a transcript of his deposition therewith. Defendants further propose that each side submit brief statements identifying the deposition testimony of Dr. Hayes that they believe is most pertinent. California does not object to the submission of Dr. Hayes deposition transcript. It does, however, disa
Summary: ORDER RE HAYES' DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Defendants request that the Court take notice of the deposition testimony of California's expert, Dr. John Hayes. They submit a transcript of his deposition therewith. Defendants further propose that each side submit brief statements identifying the deposition testimony of Dr. Hayes that they believe is most pertinent. California does not object to the submission of Dr. Hayes deposition transcript. It does, however, disag..
More
ORDER RE HAYES' DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Defendants request that the Court take notice of the deposition testimony of California's expert, Dr. John Hayes. They submit a transcript of his deposition therewith. Defendants further propose that each side submit brief statements identifying the deposition testimony of Dr. Hayes that they believe is most pertinent. California does not object to the submission of Dr. Hayes deposition transcript. It does, however, disagree that further briefing on the matter is called for (Dkt. No. 66).
California and defendants shall each submit a brief of up to seven pages by MIDNIGHT TONIGHT, AUGUST 15 identifying the passages of most significance in Dr. Hayes deposition and explaining why they are significant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
