Iniguez v. Berryhill, 3:17-CV-93-KAW. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170817640
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A THIRTY DAY EXTENSION TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Elsie Elena Iniguez (Plaintiff) and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of thirty (30) days to file Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment. The current due da
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A THIRTY DAY EXTENSION TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Elsie Elena Iniguez (Plaintiff) and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of thirty (30) days to file Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment. The current due dat..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A THIRTY DAY EXTENSION TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Elsie Elena Iniguez (Plaintiff) and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of thirty (30) days to file Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment. The current due date is August 21, 2017. The new due date will be September 20, 2017. This is the first extension of time requested by Plaintiff. Plaintiff now must request this extension because Plaintiff's counsel is a solo practitioner, did not represent Plaintiff at the administrative hearing and as there are over 1600 pages in the administrative record needs additional time to prepare the Motion for Summary Judgment. Additionally, Plaintiff's counsel will be out of the office on a previously planned trip from August 9, 2017 until August 15, 2017. She also has two additional federal court briefs due by August 21, 2017.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly, with September 20, 2017 set for Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, October 20, 2017 for Defendant's Cross Motion/Motion for Summary Judgment and November 3, 2017 for Plaintiff's Reply.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
