CALIFORNIA v. VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION, C 17-03786 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170825e68
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE SEALING OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The order on plaintiff State of California's motion for preliminary injunction was filed under seal and served on the parties today. The Court, however, is strongly inclined to unseal the order and post it in its entirety, unredacted. If any party believes that the order should be sealed, it shall file a motion by MONDAY, AUGUST 28 AT NOON specifying why, pursuant to Kamakana v. City & Cty. o
Summary: ORDER RE SEALING OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The order on plaintiff State of California's motion for preliminary injunction was filed under seal and served on the parties today. The Court, however, is strongly inclined to unseal the order and post it in its entirety, unredacted. If any party believes that the order should be sealed, it shall file a motion by MONDAY, AUGUST 28 AT NOON specifying why, pursuant to Kamakana v. City & Cty. of..
More
ORDER RE SEALING OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The order on plaintiff State of California's motion for preliminary injunction was filed under seal and served on the parties today. The Court, however, is strongly inclined to unseal the order and post it in its entirety, unredacted.
If any party believes that the order should be sealed, it shall file a motion by MONDAY, AUGUST 28 AT NOON specifying why, pursuant to Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), sealing is warranted, specifying precise passages deserving redaction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
