Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fox Factory, Inc. v. SRAM, LLC, 3:16-cv-00506-WHO (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170828732 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF FOX FACTORY'S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEFS; PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . At the request of FOX Factory's counsel, Plaintiff FOX Factory, Inc. and Defendant SRAM, LLC respectfully stipulate, with the Court's permission, to continue the deadline for the submission of FOX Factory's claim construction reply briefs, as provided below. FOX Factory requests that the deadline for the submission of its claim constr
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF FOX FACTORY'S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEFS; PROPOSED] ORDER

At the request of FOX Factory's counsel, Plaintiff FOX Factory, Inc. and Defendant SRAM, LLC respectfully stipulate, with the Court's permission, to continue the deadline for the submission of FOX Factory's claim construction reply briefs, as provided below.

FOX Factory requests that the deadline for the submission of its claim construction reply briefs be continued by two weeks, which will have no impact on the scheduled tutorial or claim construction hearings, and which will provide the Court with full briefing on claim construction more than six weeks before the tutorial and claim construction hearing. FOX Factory has requested this modification due to scheduling conflicts that have arisen for FOX's counsel, including a series of client meetings in Europe for other matters and long-planned family vacations, and to facilitate scheduling meetings with FOX Factory's expert. SRAM has agreed to FOX Factory's proposed revised schedule (shown below).

Accordingly, the parties' stipulate and request that the Court modify the dates in the case schedule as follows:

Event Current Date Proposed New Date FOX Factory Reply Briefs July 27, 2017 August 10, 2017 Tutorial September 22, 2017 Claim Construction Hearing September 29, 2017 No Change

Counsel for FOX Factory hereby attests by his signature below that concurrence in the filing of this document was obtained from counsel for SRAM.

PROPOSED ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION.AS MODIFIED, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer