Gray v. Lewis, C 13-4929 SI (PR). (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170831653
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Bernardos Gray and Defendants Lozano, Losacco, Davis, Cook, Mitchell, and Lewis, have resolved this case in its entirety. In accordance with their settlement agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice. The filing of this stipulation automatically terminates this action. Each par
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Bernardos Gray and Defendants Lozano, Losacco, Davis, Cook, Mitchell, and Lewis, have resolved this case in its entirety. In accordance with their settlement agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice. The filing of this stipulation automatically terminates this action. Each part..
More
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bernardos Gray and Defendants Lozano, Losacco, Davis, Cook, Mitchell, and Lewis, have resolved this case in its entirety. In accordance with their settlement agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice. The filing of this stipulation automatically terminates this action.
Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees in connection with this action.
It is so stipulated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
* As required under Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Andrey Yurtsan.
Source: Leagle
