Filed: Aug. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to L.R. 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc. ("SST") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS, the Parties request a modification to the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 219) to allow a one-week extension of time to complete expert discovery; WHEREAS
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to L.R. 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc. ("SST") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS, the Parties request a modification to the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 219) to allow a one-week extension of time to complete expert discovery; WHEREAS,..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to L.R. 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc. ("SST") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Parties request a modification to the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 219) to allow a one-week extension of time to complete expert discovery;
WHEREAS, the Parties' requested modifications to the Scheduling Order do not affect any dates specified in the Scheduling Order subsequent to the close of expert discovery;
WHEREAS, the Parties have previously requested no other modifications to the Scheduling Order, except for their May 10, 2017 request regarding an extension of time to conduct certain depositions, which the Court granted (Dkt. 319), and their June 21, 2017 request regarding an extension of time to serve expert reports, which the Court granted (Dkt. 345); and
WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully submit that there is good cause to modify the existing case schedule regarding the time to complete expert discovery, in view of the number of expert reports served and the range of issues addressed in those reports.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties that subject to the Court's approval, the Scheduling Order is modified as shown below.
Event Current Deadline New Deadline
Expert Discovery Deadline September 8, 2017 September 15, 2017
Event Deadline (unchanged)
Deadline to File Dispositive Motions October 1, 2017
Dispositive Motion Hearing Date November 9, 2017 at 2:00 pm
Exchange of Evidence February 5, 2018
Deadline to File Motions in Limine February 12, 2018
Oppositions to Motions in Limine February 19, 2018
Joint Pretrial Statement and Proposed Order February 19, 2018
Proposed Jury Instructions February 19, 2018
Event Deadline (unchanged)
Proposed Voir Dire Instructions February 19, 2018
Proposed Verdict Forms February 19, 2018
Proposed Statement of the Case February 19, 2018
Trial Briefs (Optional) February 19, 2018
Pretrial Conference March 6, 2018 at 3:00 p.m.
Jury Trial March 19, 2018 at 8:30 am, 10 days
The Parties also respectfully request that the Court issue an order granting the relief requested.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 219) is modified as shown above. IT IS SO ORDERED.
