Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, 3:17-md-02777-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170906869 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO UNITED STATES COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the United States Department of Justice (the "United States") filed its Complaint (the "United States Complaint") against defendants Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., FCA US LLC, VM Motori S.p.A., and VM North America, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants," and together with the United States, the "Parties"); WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO UNITED STATES COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the United States Department of Justice (the "United States") filed its Complaint (the "United States Complaint") against defendants Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., FCA US LLC, VM Motori S.p.A., and VM North America, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants," and together with the United States, the "Parties");

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Pretrial Order No. 9 (Dkt. No. 202), the Parties have met and conferred and have agreed to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the United States Complaint until October 6, 2017.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, and subject to the Court's approval, that Defendants shall answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the DOJ Complaint by October 6, 2017.

SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DOJ COMPLAINT

Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Court GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to the United States Complaint. Defendants shall respond to the United States Complaint by October 6, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest the concurrence in the filing of this document has obtained from the signatories.

Dated: August 18, 2017 /s/ C. Megan Bradley C. Megan Bradley

FootNotes


1. In entering into this stipulation, Defendants do not waive, and expressly preserve, all defenses, including all defenses concerning jurisdiction.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer