Filed: Sep. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS [OR ALTERNATIVELY] STRIKING REPLY EVIDENCE MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Plaintiffs Young America's Foundation ("YAF") and Berkeley College Republicans ("BCR") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed this action against University of California, Berkeley (the "University") officials, Defendants Janet Napolitano, Nicholas B. Dirks, Stephen C. Sutton, Joseph D. Greenwell, Margo Bennett, Alex Yao, Leroy M. Harris (
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS [OR ALTERNATIVELY] STRIKING REPLY EVIDENCE MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Plaintiffs Young America's Foundation ("YAF") and Berkeley College Republicans ("BCR") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed this action against University of California, Berkeley (the "University") officials, Defendants Janet Napolitano, Nicholas B. Dirks, Stephen C. Sutton, Joseph D. Greenwell, Margo Bennett, Alex Yao, Leroy M. Harris (c..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS [OR ALTERNATIVELY] STRIKING REPLY EVIDENCE
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Young America's Foundation ("YAF") and Berkeley College Republicans ("BCR") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed this action against University of California, Berkeley (the "University") officials, Defendants Janet Napolitano, Nicholas B. Dirks, Stephen C. Sutton, Joseph D. Greenwell, Margo Bennett, Alex Yao, Leroy M. Harris (collectively, "Defendants") asserting four causes of action for violations under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. On June 28, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13). Plaintiffs filed an opposition (Dkt. 19), and Defendants filed a Reply (Dkt. 20). Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion For Leave To File Sur-Reply to Motion to Dismiss Or Alternatively To Strike Reply Evidence (the "Administrative Motion").
Having read and considered the Administrative Motion, all papers submitted by the parties in support or opposition thereof, and exhibits attached thereto, and good cause being shown therefor:
The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion and orders Plaintiffs to file the sur-reply in the form attached to the Administrative Motion, by no later than September 11, 2017.
[ALTERNATIVELY] The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion and strikes all evidence and new argument submitted by Defendants on Reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
