Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

International Test Solutions, Inc. v. Mipox International Corp., 3:16-cv-00791-RS. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170911891 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Test Solutions, Inc., ("ITS") and Defendants Mipox Corporation ("Mipox"), Mipox International Corporation ("MIC"), and MGN International, Inc. ("MGN") (collectively, "Parties"), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate 1 and request an order to continue the dates in the operating scheduling order
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Test Solutions, Inc., ("ITS") and Defendants Mipox Corporation ("Mipox"), Mipox International Corporation ("MIC"), and MGN International, Inc. ("MGN") (collectively, "Parties"), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate1 and request an order to continue the dates in the operating scheduling order (Dkt. No. 127) as set forth below. The requested continuance of dates would allow the Parties to focus on finalizing a written settlement agreement that is in progress. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 18, 2017, this Court entered the operating case management scheduling order (Dkt. No. 127);

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2017, the Parties participated in a successful mediation session (Dkt. No. 135);

WHEREAS, the Parties believe a settlement is likely imminent and have been working toward finalizing a written settlement agreement;

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to focus on finalizing a written settlement agreement;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto that the operating case management scheduling order be modified as follows:

Event Current Deadline Stipulated Proposed Deadline Complete Non-Expert Discovery September 29, 2017 November 28, 2017 Exchange of Expert Reports October 27, 2017 December 28, 2017 Exchange of Rebuttal Expert Reports December 1, 2017 January 15, 2018 Complete Expert Discovery January 12, 2018 February 12, 2018 Further Case Management Conference October 5, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. December 7, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Hearing for Pretrial Motions March 29, 2018 April 26, 2018 Final Pretrial Conference May 24, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. May 24, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (No Change) Trial June 4, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. June 4, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. (No Change)

CONCURRENCE IN FILING

I, Roya Rahmanpour, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The parties previously stipulated to extend time for disclosure of invalidity contentions (Dkt. No. 39), to extend time for the parties' joint claim construction and prehearing statement (Dkt. No. 44), to extend the time for filing of the opening claim construction brief (Dkt. No. 57), and to extend the time for responsive and reply claim construction briefs (Dkt. No. 64). The Court previously granted a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and continued the Markman hearing (Dkt. No. 70). Finally, Magistrate Judge Spero granted the Parties' request for continuances of a court-ordered meet and confer relating to a discovery dispute issue. (Dkt. Nos. 137 and 141).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer