Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Antonio v. Lacoste USA, Inc., 5:17-cv-02895-EJD. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170911921 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING OSC RE: SETTLEMENT AND JOINT STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO OSC EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Shawn Antonio and Defendant Lacoste USA, Inc. (together, the "Parties") have reached a settlement of Plaintiff's claims on an individual basis and are in the process of finalizing a written settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement"); WHEREAS, on August 4, 2017, the Court scheduled an Order to Show Cause Re: Settlem
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING OSC RE: SETTLEMENT AND JOINT STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO OSC

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Shawn Antonio and Defendant Lacoste USA, Inc. (together, the "Parties") have reached a settlement of Plaintiff's claims on an individual basis and are in the process of finalizing a written settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement");

WHEREAS, on August 4, 2017, the Court scheduled an Order to Show Cause Re: Settlement for September 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. and ordered that a joint statement setting forth settlement efforts be filed by September 7, 2017, as well as the amount of additional time necessary to finalize and file a dismissal;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to the material terms and conditions of the settlement and anticipate finalizing and fully executing a Settlement Agreement and filing a dismissal by September 20, 2017, if not earlier;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their respective counsel, that the Order to Show Cause Re: Settlement be continued to September 28, 2017, or until such later date as may be convenient for the Court, to allow sufficient time for finalization and execution of the Settlement Agreement, and filing of the dismissal, with a joint statement setting forth settlement efforts to be filed by September 21, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer