Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Nestle, SA, 4:17-cv-04803-YGR. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170912b15 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. (Plaintiff) and Defendants Nestl USA, Inc., collectively, "the parties," by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its complaint on August 17, 2017; WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Nestl USA, Inc. on August 22, 2017 ( see ECF No. 15); WHEREAS, based on the Augus
More

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. (Plaintiff) and Defendants Nestlé USA, Inc., collectively, "the parties," by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its complaint on August 17, 2017;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Nestlé USA, Inc. on August 22, 2017 (see ECF No. 15);

WHEREAS, based on the August 22 service, Nestlé USA, Inc. currently has until September 12, 2017 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint;

WHEREAS, Nestlé USA, Inc. has requested and Plaintiff has consented to an additional 45 days to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint;

WHEREAS, this extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that neither will be prejudiced by the agreed-upon extension, nor will this litigation be unreasonably delayed;

WHEREAS, this is the first time modification any of the parties has sought in this matter;

WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaged in discussions over whether proper service of process has been effected upon defendants Nestlé, SA and Nestlé UK LTD; and

WHEREAS, regardless of the outcome of those discussions, the parties agree that Nestlé UK and Nestlé S.A. will not be required to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint earlier than Nestlé USA, Inc., subject to later-filed stipulation;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that Nestlé USA, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by October 27, 2017.

ATTESTATION

I, Dale J. Giali, hereby attest, pursuant to Civil Local. Rule 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer